From Bully Blogger, a superb analysis of the Caster Semenya gender panic:
By Tavia Nyong’o
World champion runner Caster Semenya returned to a hero’s welcome in
her native South Africa last month, where the public denounced the
“gender testing” she was forced to undergo after her gold medal in
Berlin. Outraged by the racist and sexist comments of rivals who told journalists that you could tell she was a man just by looking at her,
the president of South African athletics, Leonard Chuene, resigned from
the International Association of Athletic Federations (IAAF). “This
girl has been castigated from day one, based on what?” he told the LA
Times “You denounce my child as a boy when she’s a girl? If you did that to my child, I’d shoot you.”
South Africans aren’t the only ones angrily comparing Semenya’s treatment to that of Saartjie Baartman,
the nineteenth-century Khoisan woman who was exhibited throughout
Europe as a sexualized monstrosity. White audiences guffawed, prodded
and poked at her exposed body, which they laughingly demeaned as that
of a “Hottentot Venus”: the inverse of European standards of beauty.
Challenging Semenya’s femaleness, people now assert, is imperialism all
over again. Its an especially shameful and traumatic humiliation, they
stress, for a teenager to experience. The South African newspaper, The Guardian and Mail wrote:
At 18, Caster Semenya is quite probably frightened and
confused. Her dignity has been attacked, her profoundest sense of self
laid bare with potentially damaging psychological consequences. But
when she returns home, she seems assured of a special welcome from
family and friends who have never sat in judgment on her nature. They
have always accepted her simply as Caster, the girl who can outrun them
all.
Her case is understandably upsetting, but I for one object to the
manner in which Semenya is being spoken for and defended in passages
above. Is it her defenders who are perhaps embarrassed and ashamed by
her exuberant embodiment, more than her? Semenya, according to her
family and friends, is a
rough and tough tomboy who excels in sports, scorned skirts for
trousers from the very beginning, and shrugged off teasing and bullying
about her gender long before the issue exploded in Berlin. Young
though she may be, who is to say Semenya cannot know and enjoy who she?
Who is to say that her “profoundest sense of self” lies with being
considered and treated like a “girl”?
If ever a case called for an intersectional analysis that included
queer and trans perspectives, as well as anti-racist and
anti-imperialist ones, this is it. Whether indignantly paternalistic,
like Chuene, or more “liberally” expressing concern over a fragile,
damaged psyche, like the Mail and Guardian, Semenya’s defenders are
clearly dealing with a gender panic of their own.
And who wouldn’t be? World-class female athletes have long made
people anxious, particularly gorgeously muscle-bound black ones. The
splendor of their world, which a bystander like myself can only
imagine, must be one in which conventional barriers of the body are
left behind in the dust. In the name of protecting African femininity
from a western, scientific gaze, Semenya’s defender also disguise their
own patriarchal investment in naming and controlling this gender
excess. But as her career already illustrates, such gender excess is
hard to control.
As From a Left Wing writes, apropos of Semenya and of similar cases in women’s soccer:
What is it we are looking for in a women’s game? Surely
not a confirmation of the “femininity” of the people on the pitch. It
must be something else – like how the women’s game allows us to escape
from narrow ideas about who and what women are. Why shouldn’t women’s
football be exactly the game to welcome gender-bending warriors like
the intersex athlete, and the transgender warrior?
The real challenge when an ugly, gender-disciplinary inquisition
like the one the IAAF has started crops up is not to allow ourselves to
be blackmailed into simplistic reassertions of gender normativity for
the sake of the vulnerable child. Here Semenya herself leads the way,
in her succint response to the ordered test: “I don’t give a damn.”
Instead of making her a traumatized symbol of a violated continent, how
about adopting some of her contemporary, wordly pugnacity?
And instead of insisting upon the naturalness of her gender, how
about turning the question around and denaturalizing the world of
gender segregated, performance-obsessed, commercially-driven sports, a
world that can neither seem to do with or without excessive bodies
like Semenya’s and their virtuosic performances?
The rush to compare Semenya to Saartjie Baartman, while obvious for
nationalistic reasons, misses something crucial. Baartman was exhibited
and castigated for what the imperialist eye took to be her abberant
femininity.
A better comparison here would be to the many trans bodies (like famed
jazz pianist Billy Tipton right) who have been disciplined and punished
for their female masculinity. As
in Semenya’s case, female masculinity is often associated with forms of
disguise and deceit (the stigma of “doping” and of South African
Athletics perhaps trying to “pass off” a male runner as a woman is
clearly relevant here). But it is also associated, and for related
reasons, with the extraordinary. Runners like Semenya are as much
virtuoso performers as are players like Tipton. And the virtuoso always
risks being scapegoated as a freak, even as they exhibit a skill that
is, in a sense, always already in all of us.
Recent Comments